“Are reserves ample?” is the wrong question, because it's asked of an average. The post-mortem on the 2019 funding blowup found the rate answers to the cash at a handful of big dealer banks — and to the mornings when heavy Treasury settlements drain them.
The research: Copeland, Duffie & Yang (QJE 2025) showed funding stress tracks the reserve balances of the ten most repo-active dealer banks, not system-wide totals — with spikes tied to delayed intraday payments to those banks and magnified by early-morning Treasury settlement.
Why spikes explode instead of building: the companion theory (Yang, “Why Repo Spikes”) shows the mechanism is self-fulfilling — if every bank expects the others to open short of cash, everyone delays paying first, and the system seizes all at once. Sudden and convex, not gradual.
The broad takeaway — no specialist knowledge required: the system-wide average tells you almost nothing; the calendar tells you when the fragile mornings are — big settlement days, quarter-ends, heavy issuance windows. On the worst of them, Sep 17 2019, funding printed 5.25% against a ~2.25% target. Here's how a seizure builds —
References · Copeland, Duffie & Yang · Reserves Were Not So Ample After All · Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2025 · Yang · Why Repo Spikes · working paper (SSRN 3721785)